Since at least the 1960s, the John Birch Society has been fighting a lonely battle to get the United States to pull out of the United Nations and kick the UN out of New York City. If you don’t know anything about the John Birchers, they’re an interesting bunch. They’ve always believed in a world of conspiracies and communists under every rock. When it comes to the UN, though, it just might be that the Birchers had it right from the start.
The United Nations is now calling for confiscating wealth from the “super rich” in relatively prosperous countries in order to send it to poor countries. It’s not an income tax. The proposal is to confiscate 1 percent of the wealth of billionaires. It’s simple theft of an estimated $400 billion in order to send it to corrupt and repressive governments that have run their people into the ground.
I’m not worried about alleged conspiracies for a “new world order” or a fictitious “North American Union.” But I am worried about the fact that more and more people want the UN to function as a world government. A UN agency has recently proposed that it take over the management of the Internet, and the agency chief admitted that part of the purpose is to make sure that small countries’ telecom monopolies are able to make money — by preventing other ways of getting data in and out of the country. Doesn’t that sound like a great excuse for repressive governments?

Movie popcorn overpriced? Sue ’em; spoiled children want their way
If you’re still able to read this site, Harold Camping is wrong yet again
Change sometimes happens slowly, not in the grand leap that we want
Aren’t libertarians the logical folks? So why are so many irrational now?
Old documents force me to rethink things I’ve believed about my father
Zimmerman verdict is correct, but there’s no cause for celebration
UPDATE: Judge drops charges against Diane Tran; $100,000 raised
Only through death of empires can something new take their places
Beauty queen’s suicide leaves me pondering lesson of Richard Cory