Only 10 days after the bombing of the Boston Marathon, ugly partisan politics is taking the story over. Some in Congress are starting to openly blame the Obama administration for not keeping the country safe. The head of the CIA quickly fired back, essentially saying, “Hey, don’t blame us.” And there’s NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg saying we’ll have to give up more individual rights (and add more surveillance cameras) to make everyone safe.
The truth is that perfect security is impossible. Even in a totalitarian society, attacks can happen every now and then. But in a free society, we have to tolerate even more risk. It’s just part of the trade-off of remaining mostly free.
You are going to die one of these days, and I am, too. Every one of us will. I might live to be 120 years old or I might be killed in a car accident later today. We just don’t know. We can take reasonable steps to minimize the dangers we face, but we can’t eliminate risks. It’s literally impossible.
So if perfect security is impossible, why are politicians arguing about it? And why is the media filled with so much news of terror that it scares so many people?

Taxation is theft: It’s time to take a stand about a serious moral issue
If principles of First Amendment still apply, principles of Second do, too
Slow culture changes might mean skin color matters less in future
THE McELROY ZOO: Here’s why Merlin enjoys autumn and spring
We can’t have real freedom without also allowing discrimination
What if world is becoming a place where you no longer want to live?
We have to unlearn lies before the truth can ever make sense
Super Suckers: Indy taxpayers take bath in red ink to build stadium
Shouldn’t standards be higher for those trusted to enforce our laws?