The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

Goodbye, Anne (2009-2019)
Our contradictory beliefs lead to irrational views, foolish decisions
Modern life doesn’t have to be as complicated as we try to make it
Goodbye, Courtney Haden
Widow: ‘Things that mattered yesterday do not matter today’
Only through death of empires can something new take their places
The egalitarian lie: Every group has leaders, even Occupy Wall Street
When life becomes too passive, we stop earning our self-respect
I keep searching for ‘my people’ on a planet where I’m the alien