The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

Desperate need to be special drives me to try to matter to those I love
Epiphany: My message changed when I selected a new audience
Art, culture are keys to winning the future for freedom of choice
Humans are impatient, but changes in Alabama show speed of change
Being in love shows us who we can choose to be at our very best
Good riddance, UAB football: Taxes shouldn’t subsidize college sports
16-year-old charged with felony for science experiment gone bad
Can we find ways to separate love of home from worship of government?
Anonymous attacker hit me hard, but I can’t let coward change me