We’ve seen beyond a shadow of doubt that the Occupy Wall Street protesters don’t understand economics and don’t understand the source of our financial problems. Until now, though, I could say, “But at least they all understand bailing out the banks was a bad idea.” Unfortunately, even that was too charitable.
The first professional survey data about the protesters is out, and the information is pretty interesting. The thing that really jumped out at me, though, was the news that half of the protesters believe the big bank bailouts were necessary.
So let’s try to wrap our heads around this. They are angry that the banks got our money, so they’re protesting there. But a full half of the protesters believe it was necessary for the government to give billions and billions of dollars to the banks. How do their heads not explode from holding this contradiction inside?
Do these people not understand that businesses which take unwise chances and lose deserve to go out of business? Do they not understand that what economist Joseph Schumpeter called “creative destruction” is necessary for the market to work?
The survey from which this information comes was done by long-time Democratic Party pollster Douglas Schoen. Anyone who’s under the illusion that these are just frustrated mainstream types hurting from the bad economy needs to listen to what Schoen writes about them:
Art builds bridges for aliens who crave connection with humans
Miss. church turns back clock by refusing to marry black couple
If majority rule is such a great idea, why don’t we vote on toothpaste?
Our reactions to others’ suicides say something about how we view life
Out of touch: Most politicians, media don’t understand ‘the real world’
Fear of possible violence keeps some people trapped by misery
I’d forgotten what I said about her necklace, but she hadn’t forgotten
We often act like madmen who’re eagerly bent on self-destruction