I have a certain old friend who’s very bright and thoughtful. He’s a respected attorney with a responsible government legal job. I have a lot of respect for his intelligence and his intellectual honesty, but our ideas about politics and society are strongly opposed.
When I wrote Sunday about the idea that taxation is theft, he strongly disagreed, arguing that the idea was impractical and “naively idealistic.” He referred to what I said as an “untennable radical position.” I don’t want to re-argue that debate here. Instead, I want to look at other radical positions that seemed pretty untenable when they were first proposed.
Hundreds of years ago, it was taken for granted that kings had special rights that ordinary people didn’t have. He was seen as having his power from God and any opposition to the king was opposition to God. It was called the “divine right of kings.” The king had rights that made him little short of being a god in his kingdom. No one was allowed to judge or oppose the king except for God Himself.
Taking responsibility for mistakes is foreign concept in many lawsuits
If abortion is just simple choice, why is killing babies for gender bad?
Life is full of choices, but some require us to ‘come before winter’
Few people want to admit it, but our society rewards conformity
My father’s narcissistic abuse led to my mother’s attempt to kill him
Hospital’s five-year fight to move shows health care isn’t free market

You must walk away from past before you open door to future
NOTEBOOK: The forest is burning, so quit arguing about single trees
Film’s tortured protagonist feels uncomfortably familiar to me