What if police were warned that James Holmes might be dangerous at some point before he took guns to a Colorado theater and started shooting people? Surely he would have been arrested and many lives would have been saved. Right?
That’s the standard sort of thing we tend to assume, but it appears that police were warned about Holmes ahead of time and did nothing to stop him. Does this mean police are indirectly to blame for the shootings? This article from The Atlantic certainly implies something like that. It says the latest revelation is “bound to elicit even more frustration and anger.” The writer then says “it’d be infuriating” to learn that police had a warning and didn’t act on it.
What kind of world does that writer want to live in?
According to ABC News, a psychiatrist at the University of Colorado was worried about her patient weeks before the shooting occurred. So she talked to a university police officer, but we don’t know what (if anything) the officer did with the warning. What should police have done?

Freedom of the press is for everyone, not just those recognized by feds
Is this what happens when you teach children there are no absolutes?
I’m looking at myself in mirror and asking difficult questions
Upcoming Romney-Obama contest says this is what Americans want
I finally know why I feel like a fraud when people say I’m smart
We’re all masters of denial when facing painful truths in our lives
End of life brought cancer patient to baptism six days before death
Grief keeps reopening the door my loving mother walked out of