I have a certain old friend who’s very bright and thoughtful. He’s a respected attorney with a responsible government legal job. I have a lot of respect for his intelligence and his intellectual honesty, but our ideas about politics and society are strongly opposed.
When I wrote Sunday about the idea that taxation is theft, he strongly disagreed, arguing that the idea was impractical and “naively idealistic.” He referred to what I said as an “untennable radical position.” I don’t want to re-argue that debate here. Instead, I want to look at other radical positions that seemed pretty untenable when they were first proposed.
Hundreds of years ago, it was taken for granted that kings had special rights that ordinary people didn’t have. He was seen as having his power from God and any opposition to the king was opposition to God. It was called the “divine right of kings.” The king had rights that made him little short of being a god in his kingdom. No one was allowed to judge or oppose the king except for God Himself.
Super Suckers: Indy taxpayers take bath in red ink to build stadium
Listen as Aya Katz interviews me live about my close furry friends
Smallest ray of hope can make us feel a change we need is coming
Why do loving parents let schools teach kids to be conformists?
Calm and perspective needed for Boston, not accusations and games
Goodbye, Thomas (1994-2012)

How could we take responsibility but avoid self-destructive shame?
Sorry, Newt: It’s not ‘isolationism’ to oppose invading other countries