We’re frequently told that we must support foreign invasions and military operations in other countries because that means “supporting the troops.” A veteran of the military gave me his thoughts on this whole idea on Memorial Day.
Those who support invading other countries and continuing wars that can’t be won tell us that doing so honors and supports the men and women who are fighting the wars. If that’s true, why did 87 percent of contributions from active-duty U.S. military people to GOP candidates go to Ron Paul — the only candidate who supports an end to military adventurism, reserving the U.S. military to the role of defending this country rather than invading other countries that haven’t attacked us?
More of those in the armed services have grave reservations about the way the military is used today. Some might be blindly supportive of the militaristic view of their civilian bosses, but a substantial number know better. And as many of them finish their time in the military and reflect on what they’ve seen and heard, they come to view things in very different ways. This is what a veteran said to me Monday in discussing the illustration above:

To fall in love is to play with fire, but our deep need justifies risks
We learn lessons as we mature, but it’s usually too late by then
If romantic love is mental illness, do many of us want to be cured?
Cancer unexpectedly took Lucy before old age could finish her
Pearl Harbor: Simple sneak attack or culmination of FDR’s plan for war?
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Existing biases dictate how you see grand jury decision in Ferguson, Mo.
It’s time to kick the arrogance of ‘American exceptionalism’ to curb
Goodbye, Courtney Haden