The email from Twitter this afternoon shocked me. The subject line said, “Your Twitter account has been locked.”
Why?
The email said I had violated Twitter’s “rules against glorifying violence.” What? Me? That’s not possible. But the email helpfully included the tweet in which I had allegedly glorified violence. What terrible thing had I said? It was a reply to a friend’s tweet about the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
“Agreed on both counts,” I replied to this friend. “Rittenhouse was no hero, but what he did wasn’t murder and he’s not the monster some want to make him. I would’ve been happier if all the people involved that night had had the good sense to stay home and out of harm’s way.”
And that — in the eyes of Twitter’s platform monitors — is enough to conclude that I’m “glorifying violence.”
I angrily shot an appeal back to Twitter, hopeful that someone will be smart enough to reverse the suspension. But the incident is another reminder that we are slowly handing over control of public discourse to social media platforms — and we’re left to pray that these reckless people will stop being so reckless.

If majority rule is such a great idea, why don’t we vote on toothpaste?
Life is too short to hide the love you would regret hiding at death
Changes are destroying culture, but we can build beautiful dream
Society needs storytellers to help make sense of a changing world
Without community, we no longer know each other, in life or death
If you start at love, it’s easier to get to hate than to indifference
Be afraid, friends: Chicken Little says the sky is falling somewhere
Feeling abandoned by a parent often sets pattern for entire life