I shot a casual photo of Lucy in front of our house this afternoon. She was happy in the warm summer sunshine. And I liked the perspective of the house behind her. It made her seem like the world’s friendliest guard dog.
After I posted the photo in a couple of places, a friend called me to say how much she loved it. Then she asked if I could take the same sort of picture of her dog in front of her house. I hesitated.
My house is an inexpensive old home in a mixed neighborhood. It was built in 1927. It originally didn’t even have running water. (I don’t know when the kitchen and bathroom were added.) I bought it six years ago as a cheap foreclosure. It’s nothing fancy.
My friend’s home is in a high-end suburb in a much nicer part of town. It’s worth about half a million dollars. The house has all the features that modern consumers want. But to anyone who understands symmetry and principles of design beauty, her house is a monstrosity. It’s an ugly crime against design.
How could I explain to my friend that her fancy house would look terrible as a background for her dog? How could I say that without insulting her taste?

Google’s new glasses: Geeky dream or just more information overload?
Film hurts when I hear, ‘I’ve seen what we can be like together’
Why is it ‘isolationism’ to oppose killing those who didn’t attack us?
We learn how to make a living, but not how to make a good life
Why do we stay in prison when there’s no lock holding us there?
It’s when we create art — and create a better world — that we’re most like our Creator
We can’t control timing of death, just what we do as we’re waiting