Different people want different things. We accept that in most areas of life, so why can’t we accept that the same thing is true for how the places we live are managed?
I like steak, pizza and chicken. I don’t care for seafood, Chinese food or most veggies. (Don’t mention that last part to my doctor.) I would be rather unhappy in a world where the majority voted to adopt seafood and Chinese for all the restaurants. I would be happy if none of the restaurants served what I don’t like, but many other people wouldn’t be. Fortunately, it’s not an either/or situation. I have the places I like. They have the places they like. We can change our minds and move back and forth between restaurants.
So if this competitive model is good for restaurants — and cars and computers and pretty much everything the free market provides — why do most people tend to favor “one true way” for governing territory?
Santa checked his list twice — and some of you’ve been naughty
The Cain Train becomes train wreck when candidate has to think on feet
U.S. debt per capita worse than basket cases such as Greece
On National Dog Day, remember how love can change any of us
How miserable does someone have to be to ‘troll’ a cute dog picture?
Three years after she sneaked in, World’s Happiest Dog® is queen
Tribal instincts cause us to see others as evil, when they’re just different
We need loving communities so we can know, ‘You’re not alone’
Tough problem: What does a free society do about unfit parents?