If the U.S. Supreme Court strikes down Roe v. Wade later this year, I don’t plan to talk about it publicly.
That doesn’t mean I won’t have thoughts about it. That just means there will be nothing useful for me to say. If you thought the country was divided by opinions about Donald Trump or George Floyd, wait until you see this.
If you think social media is polarizing now, just wait until what such a decision will bring. And I have nothing to say that would make any of the extremists — on any side — happy. In fact, I can’t imagine an opinion such as mine being read at that time. So if that happens, I won’t be talking about it.
Why?
Because either extreme on the issue brings about an end result which I believe is morally wrong and is socially destructive. But in this social and political environment, you are required to be on one side or the other — in the extreme — without fail. If you express concerns about what either result will bring us, you will be shouted down as a heretic.

Despite promise of new technology, today’s journalism is mostly trivia
Autumn color has finally arrived,
To think clearly, turn off the tube: Your television is not your friend
Rational rules don’t apply when the state gives itself a monopoly
Here’s Valentine’s Day music for lonely folks with nobody to love
Why do we put off changes that might give meaning to our lives?
One college senior explains financial facts to the Wall Street protesters
Had enough yet? Ready to quit pretending politics changes things?
Unjustified panic: Why are you so scared of all the wrong things?