The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

Ayn Rand spins in her grave? ‘Atlas Shrugged’ is a bad film
Ocasio-Cortez and Trump just like characters in ’75 satire ‘Network’
It’s wrong to silence anybody, even a nutcase like Alex Jones
Happiness and success elude me unless I’m doing something I love
The more I understand humans, the less I really comprehend us
National LP official: ‘It’s gotta be Romney, there is no choice’
I still have trouble accepting that my idealized world doesn’t exist
Life has a brutal habit of forcing us to confront our own hypocrisy