What if police were warned that James Holmes might be dangerous at some point before he took guns to a Colorado theater and started shooting people? Surely he would have been arrested and many lives would have been saved. Right?
That’s the standard sort of thing we tend to assume, but it appears that police were warned about Holmes ahead of time and did nothing to stop him. Does this mean police are indirectly to blame for the shootings? This article from The Atlantic certainly implies something like that. It says the latest revelation is “bound to elicit even more frustration and anger.” The writer then says “it’d be infuriating” to learn that police had a warning and didn’t act on it.
What kind of world does that writer want to live in?
According to ABC News, a psychiatrist at the University of Colorado was worried about her patient weeks before the shooting occurred. So she talked to a university police officer, but we don’t know what (if anything) the officer did with the warning. What should police have done?

Totalitarians want to seize your cash as the moral rot continues
Part of me loves you dearly, but warring parts are hostile or afraid
How much of what we do is driven by our unconscious social scripts?
What really caused me to run from a ‘haunted house’ long ago?
11 children left orphaned by plane crash remind me how fickle life is
‘All animals are equal, but [deaf] animals are more equal than others’
Surreal dream wakes, shakes me; which is reality, which is dream?
In a vulnerable moment, woman confesses she’s scared to change
Cancer diagnosis forces you to decide what really matters in life