The email from Twitter this afternoon shocked me. The subject line said, “Your Twitter account has been locked.”
Why?
The email said I had violated Twitter’s “rules against glorifying violence.” What? Me? That’s not possible. But the email helpfully included the tweet in which I had allegedly glorified violence. What terrible thing had I said? It was a reply to a friend’s tweet about the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
“Agreed on both counts,” I replied to this friend. “Rittenhouse was no hero, but what he did wasn’t murder and he’s not the monster some want to make him. I would’ve been happier if all the people involved that night had had the good sense to stay home and out of harm’s way.”
And that — in the eyes of Twitter’s platform monitors — is enough to conclude that I’m “glorifying violence.”
I angrily shot an appeal back to Twitter, hopeful that someone will be smart enough to reverse the suspension. But the incident is another reminder that we are slowly handing over control of public discourse to social media platforms — and we’re left to pray that these reckless people will stop being so reckless.

Two sets of rules: One for the public and a very different set for police
Trust and spontaneous order don’t require heavy hand of the state
As I faced my father’s narcissism, I had to confront who I’d become
Peace won’t come until you quit obeying long-gone programmers
Was I ‘fat’? ‘Lazy’? My father’s ugly words made me feel shame
My life will matter only if I can show love and meaning to others
How could a stranger at sunset possibly know what I had to say?
Anatomy of a dishonest political mailer from this week’s election
Do you obey petty rules? Or do you fight The Man in hopes of change?