Let’s see if I have this straight. If a woman wants to “terminate her pregnancy,” it’s completely her choice. It’s nobody’s business what she decides about this, because it’s her body. Period. No exceptions. That’s the dogma of the modern feminist world. Right?
But everything suddenly changes when the mother is using abortion in order to kill a baby because she wants the other sex instead. In fact, it’s illegal in many places, including Great Britain, where a newspaper claimed recently that the practice is widespread in abortion clinics after it sent undercover reporters into clinics.
Is there any way to reconcile these startling inconsistencies? We’re told that abortion isn’t killing a baby. It’s not really murder, they say. But if a woman wants a son instead of a daughter — and she makes her choice to kill the baby daughter — those same activists tell us she’s done something monstrous. Why?

Being hermit looks good as world tries to make me a misanthrope
Is Paul Krugman serious or is this some kind of weird performance art?
Lack of ability to think plays a role in public acceptance of higher taxes
Little boy for whom I was named shows what my mother hoped for
After chimp’s mother died, mama dog raised baby as one of her pups
City rushes to demolish $4.5 million transit station after only 13 years
Please be patient with my site as it’s being completely remodeled
UPDATE: After surgery, maybe I’ll eventually start feeling better