I have a certain old friend who’s very bright and thoughtful. He’s a respected attorney with a responsible government legal job. I have a lot of respect for his intelligence and his intellectual honesty, but our ideas about politics and society are strongly opposed.
When I wrote Sunday about the idea that taxation is theft, he strongly disagreed, arguing that the idea was impractical and “naively idealistic.” He referred to what I said as an “untennable radical position.” I don’t want to re-argue that debate here. Instead, I want to look at other radical positions that seemed pretty untenable when they were first proposed.
Hundreds of years ago, it was taken for granted that kings had special rights that ordinary people didn’t have. He was seen as having his power from God and any opposition to the king was opposition to God. It was called the “divine right of kings.” The king had rights that made him little short of being a god in his kingdom. No one was allowed to judge or oppose the king except for God Himself.
Creator knew truth when He said
Intellectual honesty mostly dead — but few partisans even care
Media bias: ‘They can state the facts while telling a lie’
Few things scare humans like the prospect of living, dying alone
Sorry, Newt: It’s not ‘isolationism’ to oppose invading other countries
I want to help out of pure love, but human motives are messy

Did GOP and Democrats get their scripts mixed up this time?
Online exposure doesn’t bug Lucy, but humans require some privacy
Meeting with dead man left me pondering choices of life, death