Women, you perpetuate this by reproducing with these lewd jerks

By David McElroy · January 28, 2020

It’s just another random message-board discussion among crude and nasty men. There’s nothing special about it, because it goes on all the time. It’s sleazy and vile guys — old enough to know better — talking with gusto about “banging sluts.”

And every time I see such filth, I am livid.

I ran across yet another example of this on a sports message board late Monday night. It was a three-page thread about which universities of the Southeastern Conference have the “sluttiest” female students. By the standards of such discussions, this one wasn’t among the worst. But the attitude it betrays — that these men believe women are “sluts” to be hunted for their lustful conquest — is far too pervasive.

I am sick of living in a world where this is considered acceptable behavior.

Many men grow up accepting that good guys have as many sexual conquests as possible — and they see the women they conquer as sluts. Even more sickening, many women grow up in a culture that accepts this and tolerates it. They come to accept it as normal.

Worst of all, women knowingly marry these vile creatures and have children with them — pushing this sleazy cycle into another generation.

By the time you meet one of these guys, he’s learned to pretend he’s reformed. If he wants to settle down and get married, he wants to dispense with the “sluts” and marry a “nice girl.” If that’s you, he might even pretend to be sorrowful for his past — but this sort of attitude rarely changes. You don’t really believe his expressions of sorrow for his past deeds, do you?

If you’re as sickened by this sort of behavior as I am — this complete devaluation of women — you’re a fool for believing that it really changes. You can read the sorts of things these men say among themselves and ask yourself whether they would ever tell their wives or daughters what they really think. Here’s an example.

“I’ve had lots of luck with Auburn and UK women over the years,” one man wrote. “Auburn women are usually dumb as dirt and looking for a husband or serious boyfriend, so they’re easy to play. UK women are hot as frick and like to get sloppy drunk and get naked. Not many natural blondes at UK though.”

Various men had different opinions about where it was easiest to hunt for such “sluts.” And these are the sorts of men who now have wives and sons and daughters. How honest do you suppose they’re being at home about who they really are?

If their wives know they have this sort of past, they’ve shown the necessary remorse, unless they’re the sort who openly prefer “slutty” wives. Yes, there are men like that. They encourage their wives to dress in sexually provocative ways simply because it makes them feel powerful to parade the women they “own” — and let other men wish they had them. They won’t tell you this, of course.

What do you suppose their sons learn from these men? Do you suppose they’re capable of teaching them to respect women? Or do you think they’re privately telling their sons how “real men” act while they’re “sowing their wild oats”?

What do you suppose daughters ultimately get from these sort of men? Yes, these fathers want to hurt any boy who gets close to their daughter — because they assume all men are like what they were — but they know what “real men” are like, so their attitudes toward their daughters — even their defense of them — is more about a sense of ownership than about respect and decency.

Some people want to tell you that this is a problem that requires us to teach boys and girls to be feminists, but that is a political point of view. This isn’t about feminism. It’s nothing political.

This is about decency. Pure and simple.

Women, if you want this to stop, you have to quit choosing these men. Until you have higher standards for yourself — and have higher standards for what you want for your children — this is the sort of culture we will continue to live with.

I don’t know how to change these men’s attitude — and I honestly don’t think their attitudes are ever going to change. Why would it? Their experience has shown them that they can treat women as sexual objects when it pleases them and then pay no price when they want a “nice” wife and family.

As long as you choose to marry such men — and remain with them — you will continue to perpetuate this vile culture. These overgrown little boys won’t stop until their evil game no longer gets them what they want.

Note: I’m intentionally not linking to this piece I saw Monday night. There are thousands of others like it out there if you want to find them and I have no interest in giving additional ad clicks to the message board operators who tolerate this.

Share on Social Networks

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

For four years, Donald Trump’s supporters screamed that everything that went wrong was the fault of Joe Biden. They were sometimes right and they were sometimes delusional. (Anybody who knows me understands that I can’t stand Biden any more than I can stand Trump, just for different reasons.) But for two months, Trump has rampaged through U.S. political life — vandalizing pretty much everything in sight — and the vast majority of his supporters are silent at best. Many watch as he blows up the world economy and they make excuses for him. They’re in absolute denial, even about things that Trump is doing very intentionally. Anybody who understands economics and history knows that tariffs are a terrible idea from a pragmatic point of view. Anybody who values individual freedom knows that tariffs are massive taxes on individuals — and they’re a tool of political control over the ability of people to trade freely. Trump is the antithesis of everything which political conservatives stood for just a few years ago. It’s far past time for people who claim to be conservatives to reclaim the principles and values which they used to claim — and stop this mad man before he can accelerate the day when we experience economic and social collapse. Open your eyes to reality and reject this lying narcissist.

Related Posts