Intuition sometimes tells you when someone is worth chasing

By David McElroy · July 4, 2020

I don’t think I made much of an impression on her when we first met. But she made a big impression on me, so I did something I had never done before. I chased her.

We met online. It’s been many years now. She was smart, had beauty-queen looks and seemed to share a lot of my values. It was like spotting a unicorn in the wild, but I felt as though I was way out of my league to pursue this ideal woman.

For a couple of months, we corresponded a bit online. A few of our conversations were deep and intense, but it didn’t seem that important to her. All I knew is that I wanted to get to know her better. I liked what I saw, but I sensed hidden depths that she wasn’t letting me see.

I was pretty sure I would fall in love with this woman if I ever saw her heart.

But she was busy. She was also in demand. I’m sure she was being pursued by other men. I didn’t get to see her heart. Then I didn’t hear from her for awhile. I’ve never been the sort who chased a woman who didn’t seem interested in me, but I couldn’t let this one go.

I set my ego aside and I chased her.

When I didn’t hear from her for a few months, I wrote again.

“To be honest,” I wrote, “I don’t normally go to such lengths to keep up with someone who doesn’t appear to have the time to write, but you were extremely intriguing based on our previous conversations, so you seem worth a bit more effort to get to know.”

I referred to her as someone who didn’t have the time to write, but I actually assumed I just wasn’t high enough on her priority list. This was really out of character for me to keep pursuing a woman who didn’t seem just as interested as I was.

She eventually wrote back. She was apologetic and said she wanted to get to know me better. We corresponded more. We exchanged email and we chatted live online. We talked on the phone. But she was always busy. Then I wouldn’t hear from her for months.

The full story is complicated. There were a lot of twists and turns. There were gaps in the chase. There were times when I gave up and moved on for awhile.

But I was never able to get her out of my head.

There were long gaps in our interaction. She went off and had a life apart from me. I did the same. But we still kept in touch in superficial ways. I eventually gave up on ever winning her. She had been someone I really wanted to have, but it just wasn’t going to work out.

And then something odd — a bizarre coincidence — led us to start talking again.

Suddenly, all of it came back to me. Even though it had been years since I’d actively pursued her, my heart remembered why I had wanted her. We started talking about deeper and deeper things. I finally saw the heart underneath that I had always longed to see — and I fell hopelessly in love with her heart.

She fell in love with me, too. It took her long enough, but I finally had her attention. She finally saw what I had always seen as a real possibility for the two of us. And my heart had never been as happy as when she said she loved me and wanted me.

I told you a day or so ago that I couldn’t possibly tell you why I fell in love with my first serious girlfriend. That’s true. But I can tell you everything about why I fell in love with this one who my heart has pursued for so long.

I don’t know why we didn’t end up together. It’s a mystery to me. But that’s not the point right now.

Two days ago, I was looking for some old email and the search brought up things she had written to me. Reading her words reminded me — more powerfully than ever — of what I had seen about her from the very beginning.

Every time I run across something she once wrote to me, I never know whether it’s good for me to plunge into the words and emotions that put me back into the middle of the love we shared. I often try to forget I ever loved her. It would be so convenient if I fell in love with someone else and I could forget all about this woman.

But once I read her words — and I hear her voice in my head — I’m lost. I dive into the depths of love and need and desire. There’s joy and excitement and pain. I come up gasping for air — and gasping with the need to say, once more, “I love you! I can’t let you go!”

Maybe I would have been better if I’d never pursued her all those years ago. Maybe it would have been better if I had let myself lose touch with her before I ever fell in love with her. My head suspects life would be easier that way.

But after all these years, I’ve never been able to get her out of my heart. And a still, small voice whispers — even now — that I can’t give up on her, no matter the cost.

Share on Social Networks

If you have problems with high blood pressure, I’d like to encourage you to consider making serious changes to your diet. There might be some people who don’t have any choice but to start taking prescription medications for high blood pressure, but I’d like to tell you that I have completely eliminated my issue by eliminating all sugar and almost all carbohydrates. (A couple of months ago, my blood pressure hit 185/144, which was dangerously high — considered stage 3 hypertension.) By completely changing my eating habits, I’m down 22 pounds and my blood pressure is now in the “ideal” range — without taking any medication. In addition, I sleep better and I have more energy. Getting away from the sugar-laden mess that we generally refer to as “highly processed food” has been a life-changer for me. Now my challenge is to avoid slipping back into old habits — by eating in the dangerous ways that almost everyone in our society has come to see as normal.

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

Related Posts