If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

Nature struggles to keep alive
Time with couple reminds me how much I miss good conversation
Taking risks, working for big goals can create success, joy, exhilaration
Regardless of political beliefs, why does anyone watch Bill O’Reilly?
Does this look like a child abuser? Voters must not have thought so
Super Suckers: Indy taxpayers take bath in red ink to build stadium
I’m trying to do something new — and I don’t know what to call it
After 50 years of lonely pursuit and disappointment, boy finally gets girl
Without the state, who would plow roads? We and our neighbors will