The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

After long but necessary detours, the beginning finally nears for me
Friday nights still take me back to sidelines of high school football
Eviction moratorium is pure theft; it’s a sign of creeping socialism
Should a rational person question orthodox assumptions on climate?
Apple’s Steve Jobs is dead
If Court reverses Roe v. Wade, we’re facing a social tsunami
Why can we sabotage ourselves?
FRIDAY FUNNIES
If our assumptions don’t match, we can clash with best intentions