For several days now, the U.S. government has been doing its best Chicken Little impersonation — even though we still don’t know exactly where the sky is falling or how it’s supposed to be a big deal.
ABC News quotes a source who says the government doesn’t know an “exact target” for an attack, but then the source admits to not having a clue: “We do not know whether they mean an embassy, an airbase, an aircraft, trains,” the source said.
In other words, the sky is falling, but we have no idea what we’re warning people about. Or where it might happened. Or what might happen.
U.S. senators and congressmen sounded grim but vague when they made the rounds of television talk shows on Sunday. U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) said the danger is “the most serious threat that I’ve seen in the last several years.” Rep. Michael T. McCaul (R-Texas) said, “And I must say this is probably one of the most specific and credible threats I’ve seen perhaps since 9/11. And that’s why everybody is taking this so seriously.”

Counting on the status quo? Do you have a plan in case things collapse?
What do U.S. colleges sell today? Knowledge or just access to jobs?
In a culture that worships youth, we’re scared to look in a mirror
In England, Oxford City Council mandates video recording for taxis
Shallow thinking and arrogance led to ruin of once-great society
Who needs due process? Kangaroo court gets power to kill citizens
Reaction to Penn State scandal shows danger of putting leaders on pedestal
Experimentation produces beauty that won’t come from slavishly following One True Way