The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

Rights or choices? It might be time to re-frame the debate
The more I see of death, the more determined I am to live life fully
I’ve now launched a new podcast about search for love and family
A bully picked a fight that night — and now I’m dreaming about it
‘Curing’ unpopular beliefs through psychiatry is throwback to ugly past
Depression can be mind’s way of saying, ‘Hey, we’re way off track’
If majority rule is such a great idea, why don’t we vote on toothpaste?
Memory Lane is seductive when
Despite advantages to digital books, there’s still nothing like ‘real’ books