Do you remember me telling you in September that straw polls don’t matter? Many of you insisted in emails to me (and in some comments) that straw polls mean a lot. Let’s revisit that discussion.
In mid-August, Michele Bachmann won the Iowa straw poll with 28 percent of the vote. Here’s the lead of a Fox News story reporting her “important” win: “Rep. Michele Bachmann won the Iowa Straw Poll Saturday, affirming her status as a top-tier candidate in the Republican race to challenge President Obama in 2012.”
That was always sheer fantasy. What happened Tuesday in Iowa is reality.
Bachmann finished the actual caucuses — you know, the vote that matters — with roughly 5 percent of the vote. Her 28 percent showing in a straw poll was shown to be irrelevant.
And what of the winners in Iowa on Tuesday. As I write this, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum are still neck and neck for a photo finish, but they’re the clear winners. (Ron Paul was in third place, a respectable finish, but far behind his 27 percent in the straw poll — and far away from the predictions of winning coming from his supporters lately.) The two Iowa winners were also-rans in the August straw poll.

UK-based philosopher: Tax money paid to state is actually ‘charity’
Who was this attractive woman? Why did her story not ring true?
Blind faith in our ability to reason led to arrogance, false certainty
What can a free society do before an unstable person commits a crime?
Cat’s ordeal reminds me that bad things happen right under my nose
Social creatures: We heal each other, but start dying when alone
The free market: It’s not just for greedy, rich white capitalists
Aren’t you thankful for the right to vote before they take your money?