If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

If I perform well enough for you, will you give me love, approval?
Ban on saggy pants: Why do we require laws against looking foolish?
Goodbye, Emily (2009-2015)
Rush Limbaugh is just as partisan and ignorant as MSNBC’s Ed Schultz
If you’re depressed about losing, libertarians are standing by to help
THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Sonny, a sweet boy who needs a home
How many warnings can life give us when something’s gone wrong?
The goals we chase can become chains that hold us in bondage
Sex is everywhere in our culture, but we’re starved for intimacy