The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

2-day-old baby reminds me that miracles still happen every day
Liberal NPR, PBS? Why should tax money pay to influence culture?
After 15 years and 2,500 articles, I’ve added guide for new readers
Sorry, Hillary: Research shows it doesn’t take a village to raise a kid
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Self-disclosure of flaws is how I stop myself from deceiving you
If principles of First Amendment still apply, principles of Second do, too
NOTEBOOK: Are Romney, Obama running for president or king?
Goodbye, Dagny (2004-2019)