If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

Zombie statists: ‘But if there’s no government, who’ll build roads?!’
When times turn too dark in my life, I’m grateful for furry antidepressant
I used to ponder who I really am; today I just ask who I am for now
AUDIO: Drama of ‘family of origin’ seems to follow us for a lifetime
After first six podcast episodes, I’m encouraged but still a rookie
When I feel too much ambition, my ego has gotten too inflated
The Cain Train becomes train wreck when candidate has to think on feet
What kind of savages are we today? ‘Pick ’em out and knock ’em out’
VIDEO: Was it ridiculous that I had to learn good manners as a child?