Let’s see if I have this straight. If a woman wants to “terminate her pregnancy,” it’s completely her choice. It’s nobody’s business what she decides about this, because it’s her body. Period. No exceptions. That’s the dogma of the modern feminist world. Right?
But everything suddenly changes when the mother is using abortion in order to kill a baby because she wants the other sex instead. In fact, it’s illegal in many places, including Great Britain, where a newspaper claimed recently that the practice is widespread in abortion clinics after it sent undercover reporters into clinics.
Is there any way to reconcile these startling inconsistencies? We’re told that abortion isn’t killing a baby. It’s not really murder, they say. But if a woman wants a son instead of a daughter — and she makes her choice to kill the baby daughter — those same activists tell us she’s done something monstrous. Why?

Yes, I truly appreciate your flaws; they point the way to your worth
Stop using children as pawns to promote adult political agendas
The best romantic relationships end up becoming mutual rescue
Her dad didn’t want to help her, so here’s a jack-o’-lantern for Hannah
Stunningly arrogant Vatican paper demands world economic dictator
Peace won’t come until you quit obeying long-gone programmers
Do tales of ‘Black Friday violence’ reflect reality or just our bias?