Only 10 days after the bombing of the Boston Marathon, ugly partisan politics is taking the story over. Some in Congress are starting to openly blame the Obama administration for not keeping the country safe. The head of the CIA quickly fired back, essentially saying, “Hey, don’t blame us.” And there’s NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg saying we’ll have to give up more individual rights (and add more surveillance cameras) to make everyone safe.
The truth is that perfect security is impossible. Even in a totalitarian society, attacks can happen every now and then. But in a free society, we have to tolerate even more risk. It’s just part of the trade-off of remaining mostly free.
You are going to die one of these days, and I am, too. Every one of us will. I might live to be 120 years old or I might be killed in a car accident later today. We just don’t know. We can take reasonable steps to minimize the dangers we face, but we can’t eliminate risks. It’s literally impossible.
So if perfect security is impossible, why are politicians arguing about it? And why is the media filled with so much news of terror that it scares so many people?

Is Paul Krugman serious or is this some kind of weird performance art?
The pounding rain from the storm brought me warmth, light and love
Social creatures: We heal each other, but start dying when alone
If you want life outside of hatred, get away from political cesspool
Where do we go from here? Things are about to get very interesting
How much of what we do is driven by our unconscious social scripts?
NOTEBOOK: Get ready for the epic snoozer of Obama vs. Romney
If there are exceptions to free speech, it’s not really free speech, is it?
When strangers tell us things we want to hear, we want to believe