There was a time — not so long ago — when Americans at least pretended to care deeply about character. We argued about politics, yes, but we also insisted that the people entrusted with power possess some basic moral grounding.
Honesty mattered. Decency mattered. The idea that private conduct revealed public truth was widely understood.
Somewhere along the way, that expectation collapsed.
What replaced it was not a better philosophy or deeper compassion. It was tribalism. We began to judge leaders less by who they were and more by which side they claimed to serve. If they fought for our preferred policies, many of us decided their personal conduct was irrelevant, exaggerated or maliciously invented by opponents. Character became negotiable. Loyalty did not.
The continuing public reckoning surrounding Jeffrey Epstein is not, at its core, a political story. That is precisely why it is so revealing. Epstein moved easily among the wealthy and powerful for years. He was not an obscure figure. He was a convicted sex offender with a reputation that, at minimum, raised profound questions about his moral fitness for decent society.
Yet he was welcomed with open arms — by other men and women of equally low character.

Tuesday’s Senate vote reminds me of German ‘Enabling Act’ of 1933
Life as misunderstood stranger feels like walking through a fog
Liberal NPR, PBS? Why should tax money pay to influence culture?
Why am I disappointed in others, when my secret sins lay hidden?
Powerful emotions come and go, so it’s worth noting if one stays
Free phone wasn’t worth keeping,
Brutal truth is that we will never be able to fix all of world’s evils
How do we often know things which we shouldn’t really know?
Ban on saggy pants: Why do we require laws against looking foolish?