Since at least the 1960s, the John Birch Society has been fighting a lonely battle to get the United States to pull out of the United Nations and kick the UN out of New York City. If you don’t know anything about the John Birchers, they’re an interesting bunch. They’ve always believed in a world of conspiracies and communists under every rock. When it comes to the UN, though, it just might be that the Birchers had it right from the start.
The United Nations is now calling for confiscating wealth from the “super rich” in relatively prosperous countries in order to send it to poor countries. It’s not an income tax. The proposal is to confiscate 1 percent of the wealth of billionaires. It’s simple theft of an estimated $400 billion in order to send it to corrupt and repressive governments that have run their people into the ground.
I’m not worried about alleged conspiracies for a “new world order” or a fictitious “North American Union.” But I am worried about the fact that more and more people want the UN to function as a world government. A UN agency has recently proposed that it take over the management of the Internet, and the agency chief admitted that part of the purpose is to make sure that small countries’ telecom monopolies are able to make money — by preventing other ways of getting data in and out of the country. Doesn’t that sound like a great excuse for repressive governments?

Does this look like a child abuser? Voters must not have thought so
If the state didn’t wither away for Marx and Engels, is there really a post-statist era ahead now?
‘Just do exactly what we say to do; it’s for your own good, you know’
If God had caused Tim Tebow to win, did He change His mind Saturday?
Death of stranger’s dog reminds me how much dogs mean to us
Unjustified panic: Why are you so scared of all the wrong things?
When politicians insist the ‘war on drugs’ is working, they’re just following majoritarian incentives
Some Ohio State football fans believe a U.S. president has superpowers