Let’s see if I have this straight. If a woman wants to “terminate her pregnancy,” it’s completely her choice. It’s nobody’s business what she decides about this, because it’s her body. Period. No exceptions. That’s the dogma of the modern feminist world. Right?
But everything suddenly changes when the mother is using abortion in order to kill a baby because she wants the other sex instead. In fact, it’s illegal in many places, including Great Britain, where a newspaper claimed recently that the practice is widespread in abortion clinics after it sent undercover reporters into clinics.
Is there any way to reconcile these startling inconsistencies? We’re told that abortion isn’t killing a baby. It’s not really murder, they say. But if a woman wants a son instead of a daughter — and she makes her choice to kill the baby daughter — those same activists tell us she’s done something monstrous. Why?

I’m waiting for life to begin, but I’m feeling lost and alone tonight
U.S. debt per capita worse than basket cases such as Greece
We hate ourselves for needing other people’s approval so much
God may be working on what we need long before we can see it
NOTEBOOK: The forest is burning, so quit arguing about single trees
I’m all broken up about ‘draconian’ cuts hitting the federal government
Anatomy of a dishonest political mailer from this week’s election
Rand Paul filibuster brings GOP rats out into the light for us all to see