If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

Ruthless impersonal judgment is typical tool of cultural conformity
It’s great to visit Memory Lane, but it’s fatal to try to live there
Was he angry to lose his family? Or because he lost his control?
What if non-taxpayers had no say in government taxing, spending?
Goodbye, Bessie (2008-2018)
You’re not watching real news; you’re watching a scripted show
Freedom matters more than safety, even if you can’t see that
Most narcissists instinctively steal approval that you deserve
Unmet childhood needs trigger addiction as I try to fill inner hole