I spent much of my weekend showing houses to buyers. Every time I do this, it’s always the same experience for me. I wonder why anybody with the slightest understanding of aesthetics would have built such houses — and why anybody would buy them.
I’m in the minority on this, of course, because almost everybody buys whatever is popular among his friends and family. They don’t know any better. They buy what they know. They buy what seems “normal” to them. So they buy houses which are painfully garish or pretentious or dull to me. And builders keep building those sorts of houses — simply because that’s what people expect to buy.
When I’m showing such a house — and people are talking about borrowing half a million dollars to buy it — I want to ask them if this is what they really want. I want to ask them if they’ve ever considered the warmly beautiful piece of living art they could build for that money instead. I want to show them houses such as this one on the market right now in Redlands, Calif.
But I don’t — because I remember how ignorant I was about design philosophy before I finally learned to appreciate good architecture, too. They wouldn’t appreciate my suggestion any more than I would have appreciated it back when I wanted something which I would loathe today.

Christmas looks different now, but I still see joy with eyes of a child
What do we prove with huge houses we can’t afford to pay for or even fill?
Snapshots of hurting people and broken families, but no resolutions
‘Vast military-industrial complex’ keeps growing and keeps killing
Effort to boot unethical congressman laudable, but will it really help?
Opening a business? It’s easier to do in Rwanda than in U.S. today
Shared misery: Nobody can have air conditioning unless everyone can
Anonymous ‘Santas’ secretly paying for families’ Christmas layaways