Facebook recently told me that I needed to convert my personal account into a “content creator” account. Why? I have no idea.
As a minor show of rebellion, I changed my work title on there to “discontent creator.” Because I refuse to define my work as “content.”
I hate that word.
To the current culture, a novel is content. A film or documentary is content. A poem is content. A painting is content. A thoughtful essay is content. A comedy sketch is content. A cat falling off a table is content as long as a camera is running.
The word treats all of those things as interchangeable cogs in a system whose purpose is to capture attention long enough for someone to show ads. I don’t object to someone making money, but I do object to a soulless system which offers no real value for the attention it steals.
I don’t want to create content.
I want to write.
I want to make films.
I want to create images.
I want to communicate ideas and feelings.
I want to create connections with others.
Those distinctions matter.
Some people vaguely object to social media “content” because it’s poor quality slop, but that’s far too simplistic.

Head and heart don’t agree about love, including Valentine’s Day
One college senior explains financial facts to the Wall Street protesters
Time and maturity have changed
Why does the mainstream ignore those whose predictions were right?
Widow: ‘Things that mattered yesterday do not matter today’
When I feel too much ambition, my ego has gotten too inflated
‘Vote iPhone in 2012’: Let’s bring democracy to the phone world
Both sides of gun debate see what they want to see in D.C. shooting