I shot a casual photo of Lucy in front of our house this afternoon. She was happy in the warm summer sunshine. And I liked the perspective of the house behind her. It made her seem like the world’s friendliest guard dog.
After I posted the photo in a couple of places, a friend called me to say how much she loved it. Then she asked if I could take the same sort of picture of her dog in front of her house. I hesitated.
My house is an inexpensive old home in a mixed neighborhood. It was built in 1927. It originally didn’t even have running water. (I don’t know when the kitchen and bathroom were added.) I bought it six years ago as a cheap foreclosure. It’s nothing fancy.
My friend’s home is in a high-end suburb in a much nicer part of town. It’s worth about half a million dollars. The house has all the features that modern consumers want. But to anyone who understands symmetry and principles of design beauty, her house is a monstrosity. It’s an ugly crime against design.
How could I explain to my friend that her fancy house would look terrible as a background for her dog? How could I say that without insulting her taste?

Maturity asked me to learn that I’d never win certain arguments
City rushes to demolish $4.5 million transit station after only 13 years
Sometimes you’re not ready for a challenge, but you do it anyway
If online attack confirms your biases too nicely, it just might be a fake
Free speech is our natural right, not a gift granted by politicians
Goodbye, Charlotte (2009-2016)
Do political labels make things clear or just confuse everyone?
FRIDAY FUNNIES