Only 10 days after the bombing of the Boston Marathon, ugly partisan politics is taking the story over. Some in Congress are starting to openly blame the Obama administration for not keeping the country safe. The head of the CIA quickly fired back, essentially saying, “Hey, don’t blame us.” And there’s NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg saying we’ll have to give up more individual rights (and add more surveillance cameras) to make everyone safe.
The truth is that perfect security is impossible. Even in a totalitarian society, attacks can happen every now and then. But in a free society, we have to tolerate even more risk. It’s just part of the trade-off of remaining mostly free.
You are going to die one of these days, and I am, too. Every one of us will. I might live to be 120 years old or I might be killed in a car accident later today. We just don’t know. We can take reasonable steps to minimize the dangers we face, but we can’t eliminate risks. It’s literally impossible.
So if perfect security is impossible, why are politicians arguing about it? And why is the media filled with so much news of terror that it scares so many people?

Would you secretly kill someone to get what you want the most?
Correcting an old error: there’s no such thing as ‘We the People’
My reaction to man’s home taught me more about me than about him
Identity politics is the cancer behind Elizabeth Warren’s lie about ancestry
Obsession with partisan hatred diverts you from economic truth
Cat’s ordeal reminds me that bad things happen right under my nose
Donald Trump is no conservative; he’s an immoral, narcissistic liar
Love & Hope — Episode 10:
Idiotic idea of the year: Turn email over to the U.S. Postal Service