I was getting frustrated with the interview Sunday afternoon, but I wanted to keep things civil and polite.
I was a guest on an Internet radio show and I’d been brought in for a political discussion about Donald Trump. One of the hosts is a woman who lives in England and isn’t fond of Trump. The other host is a man in Ohio who’s a big Trump supporter.
As we got started, I first tried to find out why the man supports Trump, so I asked him to outline what he likes about Trump’s performance as president so far. It seemed like a reasonable place to start, but things went downhill from there.
The man has a lot of opinions, but when I tried to narrow down why he believed those things, he frequently had to admit that he didn’t know the facts about the subjects. He was opposed to “illegal immigration,” for instance — and insisted he wasn’t opposed to immigration overall — but he finally admitted he didn’t have any idea how U.S. laws determine who’s allowed to immigrate legally.
On subject after subject today, most modern Americans have opinions which are not based on any reality. This man had firm opinions, but his opinions weighed his mind down so much that facts weren’t necessary. He hadn’t thought through the things he believed — and it seemed to surprise him to have someone pointing this out.
Third parties aren’t any better than two parties if they anoint rulers
It’s official: U.S. government debt no longer gets top rating from S&P
Does the ocean offer the best chance of escaping the state?
Another Obama-favored solar firm crashes — after $535 million loan
Idiotic idea of the year: Turn email over to the U.S. Postal Service
We’re more like other animals than we like to admit to anyone
Barack Obama’s effort to imitate FDR’s ’36 campaign full of danger
Didn’t we already try secession? Politicians don’t like losing control
FRIDAY FUNNIES