Some people believe that seasteading is a crazy idea. For instance, Dr. Margaret Crawford, a prominent expert on urban planning (who’s also an architecture professor at Berkley) says it’s “a silly idea without any urban-planning implications whatsoever.” Isn’t that the reaction of the establishment anytime anyone suggests something that might upset the status quo?
I don’t think I want to live on the ocean. You might not, either. But even those of us who don’t want to go this route should benefit from the project being successful, so I’m a big cheerleader for it. I’ve covered this before, but there are new things going on, so this is a bit of an update.
Seasteading is simply the radical idea that we can build places to live out in the ocean. Think of it as a cruise ship that never calls at a port. Away from the jurisdiction of existing states, there’s nothing to stop independent groups from setting up their own independent entities — with their own rules. In other words, it has the possibility of putting a lot of pressure on the nation-states if productive people take up residence outside of their ability to tax them and control them.

Openly gay people in U.S. military? So what? I have no objections
In ’98, Ron Paul warned U.S. policy was leading to terrorist attacks
Face the facts: U.S. Constitution is dead document with no meaning
My need to win isn’t pretty, but it’s key to who I’ve always been
Don’t be shocked if insane system produces narcissistic leaders
Do we choose to be free people? Or will we live as slaves to mobs?
THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Tommy, who needs a home before winter
Jalen Hurts’ team-first attitude is antidote to ESPNization of sports
Modern obsession with ‘hot girls’ teaches everybody to be shallow