There are basically two competing narratives about Christopher Columbus. As we observe another Columbus Day — along with the annual arguments over him — I’d like to suggest a third way of looking at the man.
When I was a kid, Columbus was a hero. He was a brave explorer who discovered America while looking for a shorter trade route to India. His discovery led to people from European countries braving terrible danger to come to the New World and start the colonies that would eventually form the United States and give us the country we have today.
Today, the view is entirely different. Columbus was a greedy, murdering villain who is responsible for the destruction of the peaceful Native American societies that existed before he showed up. The natives were universally peace-loving and kind people who had their way of life destroyed by Columbus. If it hadn’t been for Columbus, the natives would have continued living in peace and harmony while the Europeans fought among themselves elsewhere.
Neither view is especially honest or nuanced. I’d like to suggest a third possibility.
Columbus was just another in a very long line of men of every race who have gone off in search of fame and fortune. There was nothing especially great about him or especially evil about him. Human beings have a long history of killing each other — in sometimes cruel ways — especially when they meet groups or tribes of others who are weaker than they are in some way. Look at history and see how every group of people has played the role of oppressor and the role of villain at some point.

Tough problem: What does a free society do about unfit parents?
I’m drawn to tales of brokenness, rescue and ultimate redemption
Most prizes feel empty, because our real need is for connection
With each ‘improvement,’ we’re losing family and community
Two sets of rules: One for the public and a very different set for police
To save my own sanity, it’s time for me to shut up about Trump
We who believe life has meaning have lost war for modern culture
I love my iPad, but I suspect that books are better for ‘deeper’ learning