A screaming banner headline on the Drudge Report caught my eye Friday night: “IRS asked group about ‘content of their prayers.'”
What? The IRS was asking people what they talked to God about? That’s what the headline seemed to say, especially given the fact that there were quotes around those last four words. (Here’s a screenshot.) This sounds even further out of bounds than what we already knew about the IRS targeting conservative groups, I thought.
And then I quickly started questioning the source of this allegation. The headline stated it as a fact, not as a mere allegation. Then I followed the story to its source and realized that it was a lie to make a really bad story sound even worse.
According to the Washington Examiner, during the Friday congressional hearing, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., said this in an exchange with an IRS witness: “Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers.'”
So what was the source of this allegation? According to the Examiner, it was a press release issued by the conservative Thomas More Society. The group produced a report — at the request of Schock, the Republican congressman — and the press release contains this charge: “Further questioning by the IRS requested detailed information about the content of the group’s prayer meetings, educational seminars, and signs their members hold outside Planned Parenthood.” [Emphasis mine]
What should we do if social media make us lonely, cause depression?
Past behavior is best indicator of how he’ll treat you in the future
Narcissists use ‘flying monkeys’ to keep victimizing their victims
People who invoke ‘fairness’ generally just mean, ‘Do things my way — or else’
Why is it ‘isolationism’ to oppose killing those who didn’t attack us?
What if I’ve fooled myself — and darkness is all that waits for me?
AUDIO: We rarely realize we’re wasting our lives ’til it’s too late
When you compromise principles, you soon won’t recognize yourself
Despite advantages to digital books, there’s still nothing like ‘real’ books