When most people demand “tolerance” of others, they really mean they insist that others accept their own positions — and then they’re outraged if positions contrary to their own are actually tolerated.
I keep thinking about that when I read about the gay activists who are leading obsessive boycotts of the fast food chain, Chick-fil-A. For decades, these same gay activists have demanded that everyone show toleration of their sexual orientation. There was a time when gays and lesbians were horribly mistreated by the law. We’re not living in that day, and it’s silly to pretend that we are. (I’ve argued that the state has no business defining marriage and dictating who can marry, so I’m not in a camp that wants to legally define marriage in any particular way.)
Activists are angry with Chick-fil-A because the private company’s owners have given money to Christian groups, some of which have favored efforts to legally define marriage as being between a man and a woman. The activists say this isn’t just a disagreement. No, it’s “hate,” they say. They don’t give any evidence that Chick-fil-A hates anyone. They simply define disagreement with their view as hatred. It’s hard to imagine a more insane twisting of what words really mean.

Sabans remind me that choice of partner can be a key to success
Egypt trying to prove democracy means tyranny of the majority
Why does most love hurt us? Because one usually loves more
Drug raid in Birmingham points to folly and failure of the ‘drug war’
Nothing new here: Russell Brand pushing same old socialist idiocy
One college senior explains financial facts to the Wall Street protesters
I’m not sure what’s left to say about politics, so here’s a picture of a cat
The Alien Observer: The Outrage Machine is destroying us all