I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

Reality frequently doesn’t match fantasy when you know full story
New Year’s resolutions don’t change anything until we change ourselves
Good riddance, UAB football: Taxes shouldn’t subsidize college sports
Federal checks are destroying incentive to take entry-level jobs
Nightmarish dreams mean dead can continue to play mind games
Beauty and love are all around us if our eyes and hearts are open to them
You finally have to stop making excuses for people who hurt you
This is my new wife, Claire — but she doesn’t actually exist
Hospital’s five-year fight to move shows health care isn’t free market