I shot a casual photo of Lucy in front of our house this afternoon. She was happy in the warm summer sunshine. And I liked the perspective of the house behind her. It made her seem like the world’s friendliest guard dog.
After I posted the photo in a couple of places, a friend called me to say how much she loved it. Then she asked if I could take the same sort of picture of her dog in front of her house. I hesitated.
My house is an inexpensive old home in a mixed neighborhood. It was built in 1927. It originally didn’t even have running water. (I don’t know when the kitchen and bathroom were added.) I bought it six years ago as a cheap foreclosure. It’s nothing fancy.
My friend’s home is in a high-end suburb in a much nicer part of town. It’s worth about half a million dollars. The house has all the features that modern consumers want. But to anyone who understands symmetry and principles of design beauty, her house is a monstrosity. It’s an ugly crime against design.
How could I explain to my friend that her fancy house would look terrible as a background for her dog? How could I say that without insulting her taste?

Archived audio of my Alaska radio interview available for download
If you want permission to skip that Super Bowl party, here it is
Do I oppose rulers because I hate rulers — or because I hate rules?
Irony: Libyan rebels now rounding up blacks, sticking them into jails
I often need this warning label: ‘Does not play well with others’
Three of Colorado shooting victims died protecting their girlfriends
Good riddance, UAB football: Taxes shouldn’t subsidize college sports
More dependence ahead now that half of households get U.S. checks
When you make your life choices, you also pick the consequences