Everybody knows “net neutrality” is a great idea. Right?
Ask any self-respecting member of the digerati and you’ll get the same response. We need net neutrality to “save our Internet.” That’s what all their slogans say, so it must be true.
But do you know what the real issues are? Do the people leading the pro-net neutrality crusades even understand what they’re advocating? Or are they just going along with what seems like a good idea since it’s aimed at big companies they don’t like?
There are few issues today which are as dishonestly framed as “net neutrality.” Although I like many of the outcomes which its advocates favor, the idea is a massive intrusion on private property — and it sets up government to control the Internet.
Briefly, the idea of net neutrality is that any Internet provider must treat every packet of data coming through the network equally. The provider isn’t allowed to charge more or less for one type of data — video or traffic coming from one particular site, for instance. An Internet service provider isn’t allowed to have plans that give a user all the data he wants from one company but have metered access (or no access) for data coming from a different company.

Shingle reminds me what it felt like for someone to believe in me
Facebook leads to marriage for couple whose love never died
Trusting Obama to create jobs is like trusting an arsonist to put out fires
Movie popcorn overpriced? Sue ’em; spoiled children want their way
Authentic identity gets lost when everything becomes performance
When it comes to ideas, should we prefer complexity or simplicity?
For governance, ‘one size fits all’ is a bad idea — even if the ‘one size’ is your version of freedom
AUDIO: Partnership idea sounded great, but it was just a dead end
What do you do when it feels as though your entire world is over?