Let’s see if I have this straight. If a woman wants to “terminate her pregnancy,” it’s completely her choice. It’s nobody’s business what she decides about this, because it’s her body. Period. No exceptions. That’s the dogma of the modern feminist world. Right?
But everything suddenly changes when the mother is using abortion in order to kill a baby because she wants the other sex instead. In fact, it’s illegal in many places, including Great Britain, where a newspaper claimed recently that the practice is widespread in abortion clinics after it sent undercover reporters into clinics.
Is there any way to reconcile these startling inconsistencies? We’re told that abortion isn’t killing a baby. It’s not really murder, they say. But if a woman wants a son instead of a daughter — and she makes her choice to kill the baby daughter — those same activists tell us she’s done something monstrous. Why?

Vile human cost of war ignored by Americans playing political games
Bride is 89 and the groom is 86,
I just found out an ex got married – and I’m shocked to feel jealous
Friday nights still take me back to sidelines of high school football
We love great tales of salvation, but real change rarely happens
Normal days often turn to terror when you live with a narcissist
Jesse Jackson Jr. demands Obama hire 15 million unemployed Americans
We’re great at making big plans, but God laughs at our intentions