I’m trapped in a society where all the important public figures are middle schoolers.
Not actual middle schoolers, of course. Many of the loudest and most influential voices in our culture are wealthy executives, media personalities, political leaders and adults with millions of followers. But the most popular and prominent of them behave with the emotional maturity of a 12-year-old trying to dominate a cafeteria conversation.
Every disagreement becomes a playground fight. Every issue becomes tribal. Every insult demands retaliation. Every thought must be expressed immediately. Every opinion must be performed publicly. Every emotional reaction becomes content.
And the louder, more impulsive and more outrageous someone behaves, the more visibility that person receives.
That’s not happening by accident.
Years ago, media critic Neil Postman warned that television was transforming public life into entertainment. (Read Postman’s “Amusing Ourselves to Death.” Please.) Television rewarded personalities more than ideas. It rewarded emotional immediacy more than thoughtful reflection. Politics, journalism, education and religion all slowly began adapting themselves to the demands of a medium built primarily for amusement.
But television now seems almost quaint — and downright intellectual — compared to what came afterward.
Social media didn’t merely continue those trends. It automated and intensified them.

Check out my Tuesday interview on Steve Gelder’s political radio show
Galt’s Gulch? I can live without that, but I need my own ‘Akston’s diner’
‘Metaverse’ future seems easy, but humans thrive on challenge
I kinda like Rand Paul, but I don’t support anybody as ruler-in-chief
If you participate in sham of voting, you’re responsible for what it creates
What’s the difference between a cop and an actual peace officer?
When you can’t call one you love, silent phone just taunts your need
In defense of the legal right to anonymous speech, political lies
Why do I suffer deep alienation when I fear I’m misunderstood?