If there’s one thing that most conservatives and libertarians agree on, it’s about the gospel of privatization. Both groups agree that everyone is better off when governments contract with private companies to perform services.
If you look at the Reason Foundation’s website, you can find all about the glories of privatization and why it’s better than having government employees perform the work.
You’ll see praise of privatizing public works, garbage collection, lotteries and airport screening, among others. I’m sure the facts of the reports and studies are accurate as far as they go, but they’re missing the most basic point, as far as I’m concerned.
If I am forced by a city or state to fork over the money to pay for paving roads or collecting trash or maintaining public parks, how much does it matter to me whether the employees who do the work are government employees or on the payroll of a company that I’m required to support, whether I like the work or not?
I’ve been thinking about this because I’ve been noticing horribly incompetent companies I deal with lately. That’s made me wonder why I should prefer dealing with one of them — if I didn’t have any choice in the matter — rather than government employees. Why is an incompetent private company with a monopoly any better than an incompetent government?
Words of appreciation can have power to connect us and heal us
Everything sounded fair at the time, so why’d I end up paying for it all?
If there are exceptions to free speech, it’s not really free speech, is it?
It’s best to focus on future, ’cause dead past is a ‘bridge to nowhere’
Young New Yorkers say they’re fleeing the city — Why? High taxes, low opportunities
For governance, ‘one size fits all’ is a bad idea — even if the ‘one size’ is your version of freedom

Life is like flying a plane as you assemble it from a box of parts
THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Anne, the cat who’d love to live in a shoe
Our inexplicable behavior ‘signals’ to the world who and what we are