You might not know Matthew Lesko‘s name, but there’s a good chance you’ve seen or heard one of his ads. He claims to have been researching government grants for more than two decades and he claims to be the expert on “free money for everybody.”
I’ve always found his ads offensive, because there’s something horribly distasteful to me in the idea of “free money.” There’s no such thing as free money. There’s only money that’s been taken from one group of people and given to another group of people — and that’s always seemed very wrong to me.
But I’ve been thinking lately about this issue, and I’m not sure the case is as simple as I’d like it to be. It’s not that I’ve suddenly started approving of governments coercively taking money from people. But the question of what it’s OK for us to accept from government is more complicated — at least for those of us who believe it’s wrong for the money to be available in the first place.
I know a couple who are having a difficult time financially right now. She’s working full-time while he finishes his college degree. They have a young child, and it’s a struggle to make it financially. But he’s a libertarian who hasn’t been willing to take any government assistance. His in-laws watch them struggle and seem disapproving that he won’t apply for any kind of government aid. Is he a principled man who we should admire? Or is he a fool for not taking the help that’s available?

Fear of making trade-offs to get best life leaves us with nothing
Political action may seize power, but only ideas bring real change
In bad times, human nature starts looking for some new scapegoats
No ebooks for me: Reading is about more than simply absorbing data
If you cherish the things you love, never take loved ones for granted
I’m waiting for life to begin, but I’m feeling lost and alone tonight
We sometimes need help to finish a long race we’ve decided to run
Modern obsession with ‘hot girls’ teaches everybody to be shallow
Obama’s delusion about ‘explaining’ illustrates all-too-common narcissism